Pharmageddon HELL

Relenza warning after patient dies turning flu powder into liquid

The drug company GlaxoSmithKline said that at least one person has died after turning its anti-flu powder Relenza into a liquid.[emphisis added]

In a letter to doctors, GSK said reformulation was not recommended by the Food and Drug Administration in the US. The FDA posted the letter online yesterday without providing details of the person who died.

Relenza comes in powder form for use with Glaxo’s Diskhaler device. The drug is approved to treat symptoms of the seasonal flu when taken within two days of onset.

The FDA and London-based GSK have stressed that reconstituting Relenza has not been established as safe.

Swine flu vaccine victims encouraged to post reports of side effects here: SwineFluVaccineReport.
This site was created by Mike Adams, NaturalNews editor. Read more HERE.


Information about Jim Turner's Lawsuit to Attempt to Stop Swine Flu Vaccinations HERE.

What's in a Flu Shot?
Homemade Vaccines

The Public Relations Machine for the Vaccine Complex
the role of the CDC

"If the flu season goes according to schedule, the vaccine industrial complex will be poised to join Wall Street for record year rip-off profits. We will also likely witness huge Pharma executive bonuses and perhaps gold-plated toilets. Even if the CDC statisticians’ crystal ball used to forecast rampant swine flu infections turns into a complete bust—which would only be one more added to many other failed flu predictions back to 1976—it will nevertheless be a very profitable failure as was the economic collapse for the banking cartel. The vaccine industry has now received orders in the range of 3 billion doses during the course of the coming flu season. The World Health Organization would like to vaccinate two thirds (4 billion) of the global community, and the US alone is spending $2 billion to stockpile the nation with upwards to 250 million doses.

In the US, such profits could never be accomplished without a dynamic, marketing initiative to convince Americans that vaccines will keep them protected and alive. And what better public relations machine for the vaccine complex, and all its supporters in health insurance and professional medical institutions, than our very own Centers for Disease Control and the Department of Health and Human Services. Even better, our tax dollars are there to pay for it all. We pay for the comfort in knowing that the CDC’s disinformation campaign will continue to scare us over the major networks and the New York Times. We can also assure vaccine makers that once and for all they are protected from liability in the event of serious flu vaccine injuries."

-- Richard Gale and Gary Null

Read HERE.

BREAKING:Lawsuit to Attempt to Stop Swine Flu Vaccinations


Andrew Moulden - MASS1

Dr. Andrew Moulden (Interview): What You Were Never Told About Vaccines

Vaccines Cause Micro-Vascular Strokes: Dr. Andrew Moulden, Canadian Doctor

Dr. Moulden's website HERE.

"Louis Pasteur’s germ theory was just that – a theory. His contemporaries, Dr Antoine Bechamp and Dr Rudolph Virchow were closer to the truth as to the cause of disease. Remarkably, this means that much of what we are doing in western medicine is wrong – we have been practicing medicine in a state of confusing cause and effect and causing more harm, globally, than good…for over 200 years!"

--Dr. Andrew Moulden

Excerpts From Dr. Andrew Moulden Interview:

Q. Dr. Moulden, we understand that you have made a revolutionary discovery. Can you tell us about it?

Dr. Moulden:I would be happy to.

Through my extensive research and my work throughout the years, I have discovered that vaccinations are causing impaired blood flow (ischemia) to brain and body from clinically silent to death. These are strokes – across the board for all of us. I have reason to believe that all are being affected and all vaccinations ARE causing the overwhelming rise in autism, specific learning disabilities, attention deficit disorders, sudden infant death, gulf war syndrome, dementia, seizure disorders, some cancers it would appear, and much much more.

Q. How have you been able to show this and how have you managed to demonstrate this? What medical imaging underlies it all? What medical imaging is the basis for it all?

A. I have quantified and expanded standard neurological and clinical neuropsychological tools of brain function and assessment. In essence, I have “digitized” the neurological and neuropsychological physical neurological exams across neurodevelopment using contemporary image enhancement software constrained to functional localization in the brain relative to end vascular, watershed territories – “the end of the road” for varied brain blood vessel areas. All of my tools and techniques are non-invasive.

Andrew Moulden - FAST

I am now able to assess in the here and now, or looking back 50 years ago, to answer questions as to cause, in disease, neurodevelopment disorders, and much more. Remarkably, we can now advance diagnose sudden infant death syndrome, and I can answer questions relative to – Was this a shaken baby?, Did vaccines cause this person to have autism? Was this death caused by Gardasil? Did vaccines cause these damages? Since the mechanism to damages is common across all, when vaccines are involved – and sometimes even virulent infectious diseases.

Q. What is the basic information underlying your claims and what is the foundation of your beliefs?

A. Germs simply are not the only root cause of death, disease, and disorder. I have now conclusively shown that ALL vaccines, from infancy to geriatric, are causing the exact same brain damages irrespective of what disease or disorder comes out. The damages are specific to end vascular “mini strokes” that are beneath the resolution of our neuroimaging, but measurable in a before/after vaccination protocol. They are also directly measurable in real time – however, this involves techniques and technology I have not disclosed to the public as yet.

Remarkably, wild polio, pre-natal German measles, measles, tetanus, “Spanish flu”, etc.. all caused the exact same damages in the pre-vaccine era. We simply did not appreciate that a generic response in the human body was causing the paralysis and respiratory failure and more in from a non-specific immune response and instability of microscopic blood flow hemodynamics.

We have weakened viruses and bacteria, injected them into all of us and caused chronic illness and disease in an attenuated form, this is how these pathogens have always caused harm. It is the bodies response to foreign things entering it, especially under hypersensitivity states, that is causing neurodevelopment disorders and chronic illness and much more.

Andrew Moulden 4

Q. You speak of epidemics. What is your understanding of an epidemic? How does it manifest?

A. The explanation of epidemic is simple, we are now seeing:

1 in 6 children with specific learning disabilities.
12-15% children with attention deficit disorder.
1 in 87 with autism spectrum – a 1700% increase over ten years.
1% sudden infant death
40 deaths and 15,000 substantive adverse Gardasil reactions
1 in 15 over 65 with dementia; 1 in 8 over 85
Chronic fatigue syndrome
Seizure disorders
“West” syndrome
Global developmental delay
1 in 450 with type 1 diabetes
1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women will develop cancer over a lifetime.
Gulf war syndrome affecting and disabling 250,000 troops and 42,000 deaths. These vaccinated soldiers show the exact same neurological damages after vaccination as the infants and children are exhibiting after each childhood vaccination. These are strokes – oxygen demand exceeding oxygen supply – conclusively!

This is just the tip of the iceberg.

These microscopic strokes are happening to the brain and body in immediate and delayed, waxing and waning, acute and chronic ways. This is receiving a plethora of clinical labels. In basic physiology – the base cause is common across the board.

There is no such thing as an acquired genetic epidemic. The epidemic is an acquired phenomenon, from environmental factors, for which I can now conclusively show, vaccinations are the mass culprit for most of this.

Andrew Moulden - MASS

Q. What has the response been to your discoveries? How have they been received by the public / the world at large?

A.The public gets it. The chiropractors embrace it. The medical Doctors, including pediatric neurologists, are stunned by it. The pharmaceutical and organized medicine cartels – must deny it. The philosophy is “if they cannot deny the message, then they will discredit the messenger.” This is simply how the system works.[emphasis added]

Q. In your opinion, what percentage of vaccines cause adverse effects?

A. It is in my considered opinion, all of them. I can now show the evidence to back this up. The damages have been clinically silent, but we are all being harmed along the same continuum from clinically silent to terminal disorders and diseases – across all organ systems. However, my ability to measure and prove my point, for the moment, is locked in on the brain functions and neurobehavioral and neuropscyhiatric and neurological conditions primarily.

Q. In your opinion, are all vaccines “suspect” or are there certain vaccines which are still “acceptable” and if yes, which one(s) ?

A. It is no longer an opinion as I now have conclusive evidence to show that ALL vaccines are causing the exact same damages for us all in the exact same manner that wild polio virus caused paralysis, respiratory failure (“Iron lung”), death, bleeding into the brain, and more.

It is the act of repeat vaccinations, properly spaced apart that is creating one part of the problem. It is the aluminum that is creating a second part of the problem. ALL other foreign substances in vaccines are creating a third part of the problem – like adding fuel to a fire. One does not need to be directly vaccinated to be vaccine injured.


Andrew Moulden Speaking

Q. Are the toxic adjuvants in vaccines, like aluminum, the only ones which can trigger the reactions you mention or can vaccine antigens contribute to these reactions also? In other words, in your opinion, if vaccines did not contain aluminum, would this completely solve their toxicity problem or not? Do you feel that all vaccines should be banned, i.e. that it is the whole vaccination philosophy which is at fault, or is it only that vaccines and their ingredients need to be modified to made “good vaccines”?

A. It is in my opinion, backed up with conclusive evidence that all vaccines have to be banned. They are all causing ischemic brain and body damages and chronic illness and disease


How to Survive Swine Flu Pharmageddon

"... this short video... is helpful for anyone who feels fearful of the virus itself. There are natural ways to deal with a virus so take these simple suggestions to heart. Never fear a fever. NEVER medicate a Fever! Fever is your friend. Just feed it plenty of water and let it take it's natural healing course to heal you. More tips in the video. I would like to remake this video in my spare time (big laugh) but it's the best I've got for right now. And "NO", I'm not selling anything! as some have laughingly accused me.The Healing Praxis series is 100 % FREE to view at your leisure. My humble contribution to mankind (Kind Man)." --Susan Wolfrey

This is a FREE Healing Series Go Here: The Healing Praxis

Mike Adams"Health Ranger"on Alex Jones Tv 1/5:Chemical-Based Medicines Don't Work!

Swine flu vaccine victims encouraged to post reports of side effects here: SwineFluVaccineReport.
This site was created by Mike Adams, NaturalNews editor. Read more HERE.

Vacuna contra gripe común también prevendría gripe A / Foto: Reuters

Just Get Your Flu Shot!

"Everybody is concerned that the evidence itself might be sometimes falsified by the medical industry," says doctor in BMJ "swine flu" letters section"

Dr. Herbert H. Nehrlich,
Private Practice
Bribie Island, Australia
Send response to journal:
Re: The Generals Once Upon A Time Led the Troops

"Well blow me down .
The swine flu is BAD, we must all shiver at the mere thought and we had better listen to the experts."

"If the vaccine is so safe I would suggest that the manufacturer voluntarily accept liability again; if the flu is so terrible why are we seeing so few victims?"[emphasis added]

"The experts use colourful words to support their scaremongering, "a thousandfold" could only be aimed at a nation of really dumb sheep."

"With experts like these who needs to have common sense?
Another thought comes to mind, why not lead by example and have the experts be first in line, you know, roll up the sleeve....."

"Competing interests: None declared"

Swine flu and the public trust24 September 2009

Original comments HERE

Dr Artur P Bartosik, MD,
Independent Complementary Medicine Consultant Topsham Road, Exeter EX2 4RW
Send response to journal:
Re: Swine flu and the public trust

"I find the recent debate over the safety of swine flu vaccinations very worrying. I think that not only the safety of the public health is at stake but also the public trust in health services, in general."

"Evidence based medicine was a guideline for all members of the public on how to go about their health problems. Now, everybody is concerned that the evidence itself might be sometimes falsified by the medical industry. Do we have effective democratic mechanisms to make sure that the results of all medical scientific studies are totally independent and safe for the public?"

"The public trust in the recent years has been seriously damaged by several political decisions including health care decisions and the internet is booming with criticisms from all sectors of the society worldwide. Young people in Poland and other European countries deliver self-printed leaflets door-to-door warning members of the public against swine flu vaccinations. I think that no pandemic regulations or even a martial law will be able co control the situation if we are really in trouble."

"I think that evidence based medicine sometimes forgets about our natural abilities to withstand any disease, the psychological placebo effect in its own right and our collective mind and collective psychological defense mechanisms. It might be "thousandfold" safer to put some serious money in promoting democratic institutions supervising the medical industry and the decision makers than to rely on mass media and socio-technics."

Competing interests: complementary medicine practitioner
Crying wolf25 September 2009

Joan McClusky,
Medical writer
New York, NY 10003
Send response to journal:
Re: Crying wolf

"Every autumn, millions of people--including me--get a regular "flu shot." Anyone who's had a miserable bout of the flu in the past often needs no other inducement.
But the way swine flu, and a vaccine to prevent it, have been handled has overtones of PT Barnum that lead many to ask, "why the overkill?"

"WHO decided to redefine "pandemic" to reflect spread rather than severity. And suddenly the news was full of images from around the world of travelers being screened, face masks worn in pubic and other images supporting the description of an "hysterical reaction" --particularly since swine flu does not seem to be particularly dangerous or to spread any more rapidly than any other type."

"And that seeming hype is followed by more urging vaccination.
The public is reacting in the well-characterized fashion of those within hearing range of the boy who cried wolf. And the internet makes listeners of us all.
Competing interests: None declared"


KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK DOCS 2009-10-07 22:01:14

"Too right Docs leaflets out posters up,
boxing gloves on.
We don't want this vaccine
its not needed
its unsafe
the world knows it
Although there is still some sheeple out there who think thier GOVERNMENT LOVE THEM ahhhh BLESS"

"Look at all the money they've spent on trying to poison the world they could have used that money to get ON A ROCKET to the MOON the "lot of them" and be there in time for when NASA BOMB the MOON this Friday LOL"

Original Swine Flu Comments here

Kansas Governor :en:Kathleen Sebelius speaks w...Image via Wikipedia

Americans Must Get Swine Flu Vaccination

Why does Health and Human Services Secretary, Kathleen Sebelius relentlessly shepherd the American people into taking a very questionable vaccine for protection against a proven, mild flu? It's easy for Kathleen to assure us this likely bioweapon -- I mean 'flu' vaccine is safe. She has NOTHING to lose and everything to gain. She's a government sponsored, drug pusher for Big Pharma -- and they pay their lackeys well. The real question is this: What is her official claim of safety based on? Could it be based on assurances from the vaccine manufacturers like Baxter and Novartis and the genocidal driven WHO? Could it be based on the "comforting illusions" of those who stand to make billions from the toxic jab? Well Kathleen, if the U.S. government and the WHO are so certain of the safety of this vaccine (weapon of mass destruction) then why has everyone involved in this dangerous hoax been removed from any and all forms of liability?

"The government’s $16 million propaganda drive to persuade Americans to get the swine flu vaccine and to erase public skepticism over the safety of immunizations is now in full flow, with Sebelius appearing on almost every major news network today."--Steve Watson, Prison Planet

Those wise enough to do their own research on the so-called "swine flu" and Big Pharma's vaccination scam would NEVER, ever submit to it. We should know by now, without a doubt, that the WHO, the U.S. government and the MSM (mainstream media) are all in bed with Big Pharma, and they are pushing this evil, psychological operation in a coordinated fashion. That's why government mouthpieces like Sebelius can tell us with a straight face: "Americans MUST get swine flu vaccination". Who benefits? Who loses? Follow the money!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The Dead Peasants Society and the American Holocaust

Michael Moore's Expose of 'Dead Peasant' Insurance Policies

ABC News 'Stunned' To Discover Dead Peasant Insurance . . . Really?

--Alien Abductee

Health Maven Commentary

Why is it that corporations have the money to pay for stealth, employee, death insurance, but don't have the money to pay for employee, health insurance? In the video ABC News, media celebrities characterize 'dead peasant' insurance as "creepy." And it is. But merely describing dead peasant insurance as creepy sends the wrong message about this obscene practice. The reality is it's a systemic, and 'legal' P R E D A T O R Y practice. It's revealing of the fact that the Elites routinely view people as corporate assets, or things that can be exploited at will for their profit--just like stocks, bonds, derivatives and other Wall Street Ponzi scheme financial instruments of mass destruction. It's dehumanizing. And that hurts--all of us.

"For example, on corporate-owned life insurance, Moore notes that one cannot take out fire insurance on a neighbour’s house because doing so would provide a financial incentive to burn the house down. The apparent implication is that companies may be killing off their workers to collect insurance payouts. There is no evidence of such skullduggery, or at least Moore does not present any."

"The real issue, which Capitalism fails to mention, is that corporations can use such insurance policies to avoid paying taxes. Whereas interest on money borrowed to pay premiums is tax-deductible, the resulting insurance payouts are tax-exempt. "Dead peasant" insurance is not a new and sinister corporate scheme to profit from death, but an old and sinister corporate scheme to drain the public treasury."

-- Erin Weir at the Canadian economics blog Progressive Economics Forum

Although Erin raises a significant issue, Health Maven considers this to be the REAL issue:

How much money has actually been made by corporations from current and former low-level employees who died because they couldn't afford health Insurance? Of course, we will never know.

Health Maven does not favor Big Pharma, forced, disease management 'health' insurance. However, something has to be done about the absence of REAL and AFFORDABLE health care options in America.

Mike Adams, Health Ranger from Natural News asks:

Read this, Senators: Taiwan's universal health care system provides full coverage for $21 a month - why can't we?

Keep reading.

France's Model Healthcare System

U.S. Spends Most on Health, But France No. 1 in Treatment

Myth: The U.S. has the best health care system in the world.

"Seven years ago, the World Health Organization made the first major effort to rank the health systems of 191 nations. France and Italy took the top two spots; the United States was a dismal 37th. More recently, the highly regarded Commonwealth Fund has pioneered in comparing the United States with other advanced nations through surveys of patients and doctors and analysis of other data. Its latest report, issued in May, ranked the United States last or next-to-last compared with five other nations — Australia, Canada, Germany, New Zealand and the United Kingdom — on most measures of performance, including quality of care and access to it. Other comparative studies also put the United States in a relatively bad light."

--NY Times Editorial Aug. 12th 2007

The top 10 healthcare systems in the order determined by the World Health Organization

1. France

2. Italy

3. San Marino

4. Andorra

5. Malta

6. Singapore

7. Spain

8. Oman

9. Austria

10. Japan

An American Holocaust

Did you know 44,789 U.S. residents die every year because they have no health insurance?
"I Would Like To Apologize To The Dead"
By Congressman Alan Grayson

"Last night, I gave a speech and I’m not going to recount everything I said but after that speech, several republicans asked me to apologize. I would like to apologize.

I would like to apologize and here's why. according to this study, health insurance and mortality in adults which was published two weeks, 44,000 Americans die every year because they have no health insurance. 44,789 Americans die every year according to the Harvard study. and you can see it by going to our website at that is 10 times more than the number of Americans who have died in Iraq and who died in 9/11. but that was just once. this is every single year. that's right. every single year.

Take a look at this. read it and weep. and I mean that, read it and weep, because of all these Americans who are dying because they don't have health insurance. Now, I think we should do something about that and the democratic health care plan does do something about that. It makes health care affordable for those who can't afford insurance and it safes these peoples' lives.

Let's remember we should care about people even after they're born. I call upon the democratic members of the house, I call upon the republican members of the house, I call upon all of us to do our jobs for the sake of America, for the sake of those dying people and their families.

I apologize to the dead and their families that we haven't voted sooner to end this holocaust in America. I yield the rest of my time."

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Aspirin Misuse May Have Made 1918 Flu Pandemic Worse

asprin bottle, color photo

ScienceDaily (Oct. 3, 2009) — The devastation of the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic is well known, but a new article suggests a surprising factor in the high death toll: the misuse of aspirin. Appearing in the November 1 issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases and available online now, the article sounds a cautionary note as present day concerns about the novel H1N1 virus run high.

High aspirin dosing levels used to treat patients during the 1918-1919 pandemic are now known to cause, in some cases, toxicity and a dangerous build up of fluid in the lungs, which may have contributed to the incidence and severity of symptoms, bacterial infections, and mortality. Additionally, autopsy reports from 1918 are consistent with what we know today about the dangers of aspirin toxicity, as well as the expected viral causes of death.

The motivation behind the improper use of aspirin is a cautionary tale, said author Karen Starko, MD. In 1918, physicians did not fully understand either the dosing or pharmacology of aspirin, yet they were willing to recommend it. Its use was promoted by the drug industry, endorsed by doctors wanting to “do something,” and accepted by families and institutions desperate for hope.

“Understanding these natural forces is important when considering choices in the future,” Dr. Starko said. “Interventions cut both ways. Medicines can save and improve our lives. Yet we must be ever mindful of the importance of dose, of balancing benefits and risks, and of the limitations of our studies.”

Original article posted at New Scientist

Important Note: It's not the toxicity of aspirin that kills;it's that aspirin lowers fevers. And fever is the primary way the body eliminates viruses. "The fever is the human or mammalian body's primary generalized immune system response to any viral infection. Any palliative treatment which reduces the fever of flu infections will prolong the infection and may lead to irreparable damage or death, mostly from the resulting viral pneumonia."

--From:Health Maven Post: Fever Kills Viruses - Don't Kill the Fever

Get more details in this Natural News article of the same name click here.


Conventional medicine is very good at stealing power from patients. Doctors, drug companies and federal health authorities consistently tell patients they have no power over their health: Disease is a matter of luck, they say. Your genes are to blame. There's no such thing as healing foods, herbs or nutrients. Only drugs can help you now.

It's all nonsense, of course, and it's part of the "power theft" perpetrated every day by promoters of conventional medicine.

Today, I'd like to show you how to take that power back from those who have stolen it. In my book "Take Back Your Health Power!" I show you how to take control of your health from this day forward, putting your health results firmly in your own hands rather than those of doctors, drug company executives or FDA bureaucrats."

--Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

Power to the PEOPLE'S pharmacy!

Health Maven Presents
The Cure is in The Kitchen

Real food is our first medicine. Health starts in the kitchen. Welcome to Health Maven's newest weekly feature: The Cure is in the Kitchen. Of course, the idea behind this series is to inspire you to transform your kitchen into a genuine healing center. The Cure is in the Kitchen will feature practical information about herbs, kitchen table medicine, and healthy recipes from around the world. Health Maven will gently encourage you to start growing your own organic culinary herbs. Eventually, you will want to start growing your own medicinal herbs by creating a medicine garden. Everyone needs to learn how to make their own medicinal herbal tinctures, salves, and teas. Health Maven wants to empower you to take back your health from Big Pharma and the Medical Mafia. Nobody cares about your health like you do . . . right?

Isn't it time to back our P O W E R from the Medical Mafia and Big Pharma!

This is where you can familiarize yourself with the world of culinary herbs The Culinary Herb FAQ.

Make Your Own Healthy Fresh Cheese

What is Paneer?

Paneer is a fresh cheese traditionally made from whole milk typically [raw milk]. It is crumbly and semi-soft when raw, and has a firm, slightly chewy texture when cooked. Its faintly nutty flavor works well with many different foods and spices. It does not melt down with frying or cooking, but retains its shape and texture, so it can crumbled or cubed for use in different dishes.

From the Ayurvedic perspective, paneer offers nourishment but can be taxing on the digestion. It is preferable to eat paneer dishes at the mid-day meal, and to cook it with spices that enhance digestion. If you would like to combine paneer with other vegetables, or to make it in a sauce, dice the paneer and fry the cubes in ghee separately and add to the dish two to three minutes before the cooking process is complete. Fried paneer cubes make an excellent garnish for rice pulaos. Sliced paneer can be baked into a casserole with other vegetables.

While paneer is available at Indian grocery stores, it can easily be made fresh at home. Ayurvedic healers recommend making the paneer fresh for use within the day for better digestibility.

How to Make Fresh Paneer at Home

Materials: 1/2 gallon whole,[organic or better yet [Raw milk] (about 8 cups) and 4-5 tablespoons fresh lemon juice, 4 sheets of cheesecloth or muslin, a heavy weight such as a clean brick.

Step 1. Bring the milk to a boil in a heavy-bottomed pan, stirring occasionally to ensure that it does not burn or form a skin.

Step 2. Add the lemon juice and stir once. The milk solids should separate, leaving a thin, filmy whey. If the whey is not almost clear, add a little more lemon juice and stir. Turn off the heat.

Step 3. Strain the mixture through the cheesecloth sheets, allowing the whey to drain through. Discard the whey.

Step 4. Tie the ends of the cheesecloth sheets with a string to form a bundle (with the cheese within).

Step 5. Hang the bundle up for a couple of hours so any remaining moisture drains out. If your recipe calls for crumbled or soft paneer, you can remove the paneer to a dish for use at this point.

Step 6. If you would like a block of paneer to cut into cubes or slices, place the cheesecloth bundle on a flat surface and place a weight on top for 3-4 hours. At the end of that time, the block of paneer can be transferred to a dish for use.

Yogi's notes From India Curry

Here's a simple way to mold your paneer. " may lay the tied cheese flat in between two cutting boards. Put a milk gallon jug filled with water on top of the cutting board. After four hours, remove the weight and slowly remove the cheesecloth and you will have a slab of cheese ready to cut in cubes. My son had given me a tin box of Snicker's bar for Christmas. They came in a square tin box about 2" deep. I drilled 6 holes on the bottom of the box. I lay down the Cheese (tied in the cheese cloth) in this tin can. The tin can basically works as a mold. Then I put two bricks, as a weight on it. After four hours I have 1" thick rectangular slab of cheese."

Note: For maximum nutrition and taste, Paneer should be consumed on the same day it is made.

Go Here: At Cooking 4 all Seasons, there's an excellent step-by-step pictorial on Making Paneer.

Cooking Class: How to Make and Use Paneer

GO TO: Champaigne Taste

Paneer Makhani
Photo credit: Champaigne Taste

Saag Paneer

Photo Credit: Tea & Cookies

Tea & Cookies Saag Paneer Recipe

3 large bunches of fresh spinach, washed and destemmed (this part is important)
1 large onion, chopped into a medium dice
1 medium tomato, chopped into a small dice
2 teaspoons tomato paste
1 cup heavy cream (can use half-and-half)
1 1/2 cup paneer cheese (fried in peanut oil, if you would like)
1 teaspoon fresh grated ginger
1 teaspoon fresh chopped or pressed garlic
1 1/2 tbs vegetable oil
1/2 tsp cumin seeds
3 green cardamom pods, smashed
1 stick cinnamon
3 cloves (I like to crush the soft, rounded head of the clove with a fingernail)
3 small bay leaves
2 tsp salt
1 teaspoon black pepper
Can add dried red pepper or a fresh hot green pepper for spice, if you like
1 teaspoon ground cumin
1/2 teaspoon turmeric
1 teaspoon ground coriander
1/2 teaspoon garam masala
1/2 cup fresh cilantro leaves, chopped

Sauté the chopped onion in oil until soft and golden. Add cumin seeds, cardamom, cinnamon, cloves, bay leaves, garlic and ginger, and chopped tomato. Sauté mixture for about a minute. Begin to add spinach, turning to allow it to cook down. When all spinach has been added and the mixture has turned a dark green, begin to add the remaining dry spices, salt and pepper. Mix well and continue to cook about 3 minutes. [If you would like to fry the paneer, you can do it now, cooking in a small amount of peanut oil to get a brown crust.] Add the cream and tomato paste, continuing to simmer the mixture another 5 minutes. Add paneer and fresh cilantro at the very end. Serve with rice or naan bread.




Photo Credit: Tea & Cookies

From Sustainable Kitchen

Easy Homemade Cheese (Video)

By Alexa

Child receiving polio vaccine.Image via Wikipedia

Jon Rappoport Interview of Ex Vaccine Researcher


Jon Rappoport Q: You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine.

Dr. Mark Randall A: Yes I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won't say which ones.

Q: Why not?

A: I want to preserve my privacy.

Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?

A: I believe I could lose my pension.

Q: On what grounds?

A: The grounds don't matter. These people have ways of causing you problems, when you were once part of the Club. I know one or two people who were put under surveillance, who were harassed.

Q: Harassed by whom?

A: The FBI.

Q: Really?

A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling too.

Q: So much for free speech.

A: I was "part of the inner circle." If now I began to name names and make specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.

Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?

A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate justification for the overall "brilliance" of modern medicine.

Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?

A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so that they can choose well. It's one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.

Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.

A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.

Q: Why?

A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.

Q: And then?

A: I did my own investigation.

Q: What conclusions did you come to?

A: The decline of disease is due to improved living conditions.

Q: What conditions?

A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A decrease in poverty. Germs may be everywhere, but when you are healthy, you don't contract the diseases as easily.

Q: What did you feel when you completed your own investigation?

A: Despair. I realized I was working a sector based on a collection of lies.

Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?

A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I'm concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.

Q: Why?

A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent.

Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?

A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases ˆ say, meningitis ˆ that fact is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection is overlooked.

Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.

A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.

Q: Which is?

A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccine was introduced.

Q: So you're saying that we have been treated to a false history.

A: Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. This is a history that has been cooked up to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective.

Q: Now, you worked in labs. Where purity was an issue.

A: The public believes that these labs, these manufacturing facilities are the cleanest places in the world. That is not true. Contamination occurs all the time. You get all sorts of debris introduced into vaccines.

Q: For example, the SV40 monkey virus slips into the polio vaccine.

A: Well yes, that happened. But that's not what I mean. The SV40 got into the polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys. But I'm talking about something else. The actual lab conditions. The mistakes. The careless errors. SV40, which was later found in cancer tumors ˆ that was what I would call a structural problem. It was an accepted part of the manufacturing process. If you use monkey kidneys, you open the door to germs which you don't know are in those kidneys.

Q: Okay, but let's ignore that distinction between different types of contaminants for a moment. What contaminants did you find in your many years of work with vaccines?

A: All right. I'll give you some of what I came across, and I'll also give you what colleagues of mine found. Here's a partial list. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which is a so-called "brain-eating" amoeba.

Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I've found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.

Q: Let me get this straight. These are all contaminants which don't belong in the vaccines.

A: That's right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don't really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It's a game of roulette. You take your chances. Also, most people don't know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep A and measles vaccines have been made with aborted human fetal tissue. I have found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines from time to time ˆ which may have come from that fetal tissue. When you look for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that IS puzzling. You know it shouldn't be there, but you don't know exactly what you've got. I have found what I believed was a very small "fragment" of human hair and also human mucus. I have found what can only be called "foreign protein," which could mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.

Q: Alarm bells are ringing all over the place.

A: How do you think I felt? Remember, this material is going into the bloodstream without passing through some of the ordinary immune defenses.

Q: How were your findings received?

A: Basically, it was, don't worry, this can't be helped. In making vaccines, you use various animals' tissue, and that's where this kind of contamination enters in. Of course, I'm not even mentioning the standard chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum which are purposely put into vaccines.

Q: This information is pretty staggering.

A: Yes. And I'm just mentioning some of the biological contaminants. Who knows how many others there are? Others we don't find because we don't think to look for them. If tissue from, say, a bird is used to make a vaccine, how many possible germs can be in that tissue? We have no idea. We have no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans.

Q: And beyond the purity issue?

A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn't work that way. A vaccine is supposed to "create" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than antibodies and their related "killer cells."

Q: The immune system is?

A: The entire body, really. Plus the mind. It's all immune system, you might say. That is why you can have, in the middle of an epidemic, those individuals who remain healthy.

Q: So the level of general health is important.

A: More than important. Vital.

Q: How are vaccine statistics falsely presented?

A: There are many ways. For example, suppose that 25 people who have received the hepatitis B vaccine come down with hepatitis. Well, hep B is a liver disease. But you can call liver disease many things. You can change the diagnosis. Then, you've concealed the root cause of the problem.

Q: And that happens?

A: All the time. It HAS to happen, if the doctors automatically assume that people who get vaccines DO NOT come down with the diseases they are now supposed to be protected from. And that is exactly what doctors assume. You see, it's circular reasoning. It's a closed system. It admits no fault. No possible fault. If a person who gets a vaccine against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some other disease, the automatic assumption is, this had nothing to do with the vaccine.

Q: In your years working in the vaccine establishment, how many doctors did you encounter who admitted that vaccines were a problem?

A: None. There were a few who privately questioned what they were doing. But they would never go public, even within their companies.

Q: What was the turning point for you?

A: I had a friend whose baby died after a DPT shot.

Q: Did you investigate?

A: Yes, informally. I found that this baby was completely healthy before the vaccination. There was no reason for his death, except the vaccine. That started my doubts. Of course, I wanted to believe that the baby had gotten a bad shot from a bad lot. But as I looked into this further, I found that was not the case in this instance. I was being drawn into a spiral of doubt that increased over time. I continued to investigate. I found that, contrary to what I thought, vaccines are not tested in a scientific way.

Q: What do you mean?

A: For example, no long-term studies are done on any vaccines. Long-term follow-up is not done in any careful way. Why? Because, again, the assumption is made that vaccines do not cause problems. So why should anyone check? On top of that, a vaccine reaction is defined so that all bad reactions are said to occur very soon after the shot is given. But that does not make sense.

Q: Why doesn't it make sense?

A: Because the vaccine obviously acts in the body for a long period of time after it is given. A reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual. Neurological problems can develop over time. They do in various conditions, even according to a conventional analysis. So why couldn't that be the case with vaccines? If chemical poisoning can occur gradually, why couldn't that be the case with a vaccine which contains mercury?

Q: And that is what you found?

A: Yes. You are dealing with correlations, most of the time. Correlations are not perfect. But if you get 500 parents whose children have suffered neurological damage during a one-year period after having a vaccine, this should be sufficient to spark off an intense investigation.

Q: Has it been enough?

A: No. Never. This tells you something right away.

Q: Which is?

A: The people doing the investigation are not really interested in looking at the facts. They assume that the vaccines are safe. So, when they do investigate, they invariably come up with exonerations of the vaccines. They say, "This vaccine is safe." But what do they base those judgments on? They base them on definitions and ideas which automatically rule out a condemnation of the vaccine.

Q: There are numerous cases where a vaccine campaign has failed. Where people have come down with the disease against which they were vaccinated.

A: Yes, there are many such instances. And there the evidence is simply ignored. It's discounted. The experts say, if they say anything at all, that this is just an isolated situation, but overall the vaccine has been shown to be safe. But if you add up all the vaccine campaigns where damage and disease have occurred, you realize that these are NOT isolated situations.

Q: Did you ever discuss what we are talking about here with colleagues, when you were still working in the vaccine establishment?

A: Yes I did.

Q: What happened?

A: Several times I was told to keep quiet. It was made clear that I should go back to work and forget my misgivings. On a few occasions, I encountered fear. Colleagues tried to avoid me. They felt they could be labeled with "guilt by association". All in all, though, I behaved myself. I made sure I didn't create problems for myself.

Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?

A: First of all, there is no "if". They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.

Q: Is Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, aware of the situation?

A: I would say he is partially aware. Perhaps he is not utterly convinced, but he is on the way to realizing the whole truth. He already knows that HIV is a hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs are poisons which destroy the immune system. He also knows that if he speaks out, in any way, about the vaccine issue, he will be branded a lunatic. He has enough trouble after his stand on the AIDS issue.

Q: This network you speak of.

A: It has accumulated a huge amount of information about vaccines. The question is, how is a successful strategy going to be mounted? For these people, that is a difficult issue.

Q: And in the industrialized nations?

A: The medical cartel has a stranglehold, but it is diminishing. Mainly because people have the freedom to question medicines. However, if the choice issue [the right to take or reject any medicine] does not gather steam, these coming mandates about vaccines against biowarefare germs are going to win out. This is an important time.

Q: The furor over the hepatits B vaccine seems one good avenue.

A: I think so, yes. To say that babies must have the vaccine - and then in the next breath, admitting that a person gets hep B from sexual contacts and shared needles - is a ridiculous juxtaposition. Medical authorities try to cover themselves by saying that 20,000 or so children in the US get hep B every year from "unknown causes," and that's why every baby must have the vaccine. I dispute that 20,000 figure and the so-called studies that back it up.

Q: Andrew Wakefield, the British MD who uncovered the link between the MMR vaccine and autism, has just been fired from his job in a London hospital.

A: Yes. Wakefield performed a great service. His correlations between the vaccine and autism are stunning. Perhaps you know that Tony Blair's wife is involved with alternative health. There is the possibility that their child has not been given the MMR. Blair recently side-stepped the question in press interviews, and made it seem that he was simply objecting to invasive questioning of his "personal and family life." In any event, I believe his wife has been muzzled. I think, if given the chance, she would at least say she is sympathetic to all the families who have come forward and stated that their children were severely damaged by the MMR.

Q: British reporters should try to get through to her.

A: They have been trying. But I think she has made a deal with her husband to keep quiet, no matter what. She could do a great deal of good if she breaks her promise. I have been told she is under pressure, and not just from her husband. At the level she occupies, MI6 and British health authorities get into the act. It is thought of as a matter of national security.

Q: Well, it is national security, once you understand the medical cartel.

A: It is global security. The cartel operates in every nation. It zealously guards the sanctity of vaccines. Questioning these vaccines is on the same level as a Vatican bishop questioning the sanctity of the sacrament of the Eucharist in the Catholic Church.

Q: I know that a Hollywood celebrity stating publicly that he will not take a vaccine is committing career suicide.

A: Hollywood is linked very powerfully to the medical cartel. There are several reasons, but one of them is simply that an actor who is famous can draw a huge amount of publicity if he says ANYTHING. In 1992, I was present at your demonstration against the FDA in downtown Los Angeles. One or two actors spoke against the FDA. Since that time, you would be hard pressed to find an actor who has spoken out in any way against the medical cartel.

Q: Within the National Institutes of Health, what is the mood, what is the basic frame of mind?

A: People are competing for research monies. The last thing they think about is challenging the status quo. They are already in an intramural war for that money. They don't need more trouble. This is a very insulated system. It depends on the idea that, by and large, modern medicine is very successful on every frontier. To admit systemic problems in any area is to cast doubt on the whole enterprise. You might therefore think that NIH is the last place one should think about holding demonstrations. But just the reverse is true. If five thousand people showed up there demanding an accounting of the actual benefits of that research system, demanding to know what real health benefits have been conferred on the public from the billions of wasted dollars funneled to that facility, something might start. A spark might go off. You might get, with further demonstrations, all sorts of fall-out. Researchers ˆ a few ˆ might start leaking information.

Q: A good idea.

A: People in suits standing as close to the buildings as the police will allow. People in business suits, in jogging suits, mothers and babies. Well-off people. Poor people. All sorts of people.

Q: What about the combined destructive power of a number of vaccines given to babies these days?

A: It is a travesty and a crime. There are no real studies of any depth which have been done on that. Again, the assumption is made that vaccines are safe, and therefore any number of vaccines given together are safe as well. But the truth is, vaccines are not safe. Therefore the potential damage increases when you give many of them in a short time period.

Q: Then we have the fall flu season.

A: Yes. As if only in the Autumn do these germs float in to the US from Asia. The public swallows that premise. If it happens in April, it is a bad cold. If it happens in October, it is the flu.

Q: Do you regret having worked all those years in the vaccine field?

A: Yes. But after this interview, I'll regret it a little less. And I work in other ways. I give out information to certain people, when I think they will use it well.

Q: What is one thing you want the public to understand?

A: That the burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people who manufacture and license them for public use. Just that. The burden of proof is not on you or me. And for proof you need well-designed long-term studies. You need extensive follow-up. You need to interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. You need all these things. The things that are not there.

Q: The things that are not there.

A: Yes.

Q: To avoid any confusion, I'd like you to review, once more, the disease problems that vaccines can cause. Which diseases, how that happens.

A: We are basically talking about two potential harmful outcomes. One, the person gets the disease from the vaccine. He gets the disease which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Because, some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with. Or two, he doesn't get THAT disease, but at some later time, maybe right away, maybe not, he develops another condition which is caused by the vaccine. That condition could be autism, what's called autism, or it could be some other disease like meningitis. He could become mentally disabled.

Q: Is there any way to compare the relative frequency of these different outcomes?

A: No. Because the follow-up is poor. We can only guess. If you ask, out of a population of a hundred thousand children who get a measles vaccine, how many get the measles, and how many develop other problems from the vaccine, there is a no reliable answer. That is what I'm saying. Vaccines are superstitions. And with superstitions, you don't get facts you can use. You only get stories, most of which are designed to enforce the superstition. But, from many vaccine campaigns, we can piece together a narrative that does reveal some very disturbing things. People have been harmed. The harm is real, and it can be deep and it can mean death. The harm is NOT limited to a few cases, as we have been led to believe. In the US, there are groups of mothers who are testifying about autism and childhood vaccines. They are coming forward and standing up at meetings. They are essentially trying to fill in the gap that has been created by the researchers and doctors who turn their backs on the whole thing.

Q: Let me ask you this. If you took a child in, say, Boston and you raised that child with good nutritious food and he exercised every day and he was loved by his parents, and he didn't get the measles vaccine, what would be his health status compared with the average child in Boston who eats poorly and watches five hours of TV a day and gets the measles vaccine?

A: Of course there are many factors involved, but I would bet on the better health status for the first child. If he gets measles, if he gets it when he is nine, the chances are it will be much lighter than the measles the second child might get. I would bet on the first child every time.

Q: How long did you work with vaccines?

A: A long time. Longer than ten years.

Q: Looking back now, can you recall any good reason to say that vaccines are successful?

A: No, I can't. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I'm not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move.

Q: And yet there are children everywhere who do get vaccines and appear to be healthy.

A: The operative word is "appear". What about all the children who can't focus on their studies? What about the children who have tantrums from time to time? What about the children who are not quite in possession of all their mental faculties? I know there are many causes for these things, but vaccines are one cause. I would not take the chance. I see no reason to take the chance. And frankly, I see no reason to allow the government to have the last word. Government medicine is, from my experience, often a contradiction in terms. You get one or the other, but not both.

Q: So we come to the level playing field.

A: Yes. Allow those who want the vaccines to take them. Allow the dissidents to decline to take them. But, as I said earlier, there is no level playing field if the field is strewn with lies. And when babies are involved, you have parents making all the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real information.

Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don't get shots.

A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad parenting. You fight that with better information. It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every person's responsibility to make up his mind. The medical cartel likes that bet. It is betting that the fear will win.

Dr. Mark Randall is the pseudonym of a vaccine researcher who worked for many years in the labs of major pharmaceutical houses and the US government's National Institutes of Health.

Mark retired during the last decade. He says he was "disgusted with what he discovered about vaccines."
Page 10 ˆ Jon Rappoport interview of ex vaccine researcher

As you know, since the beginning of nomorefakenews, I have been launching an attack against non-scientific and dangerous assertions about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.

Mark has been one of my sources.

He is a little reluctant to speak out, even under the cover of anonymity, but with the current push to make vaccines mandatory - with penalties like quarantine lurking in the wings - he has decided to break his silence.

He lives comfortably in retirement, but like many of my long-time sources, he has developed a conscience about his former work. Mark is well aware of the scope of the medical cartel and its goals of depopulation, mind control, and general debilitation of populations.

Original article HERE

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]